History of the International Olympiad in Informatics by Mārtiņš Opmanis

• About IOI
• IOI Journal
• IOI Conference
• Wiki
• Statistics
• Administration >
  •   Organization
  •   President
  •   Office/Secretary
  •   Treasurer
  •   General Assembly
  •   IC
  •   ISC
  •   ITC
  •   Members
  •   Awards
  •   Regulations
• Contestants >
  •   General Info
  •   Journals
  •   Previous Contests
  •   Books
  •   Other Contests
• Contact >
  •   Webmaster
  •   Newsletter
  •   Mailing Lists

Results for IOI2001 Questionnaire for Delegations

Return to IOI'2001 Delegation Questionnaire

Legend
# Respondents = 32 (raw data)
Answer 0 = no answer given
In red: maximum answer count for question
In yellow: not max, but twice answer count exceeds max

#	Questions \ Answers	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	Histogram (5%/digit)
1	Was MOBILES suitable?	2= 6%	6= 19%	5= 16%	9= 28%	5= 16%	5= 16%		01111_22233_33334_44555
2	Was IOIWARI suitable?	2= 6%	2= 6%	10= 31%	13= 41%	3= 9%	2= 6%		01122_22223_33333_33445
3	Was TWOFIVE suitable?	2= 6%	3= 9%	3= 9%	5= 16%	7= 22%	12= 38%		01122_33344_44455_55555
4	Was SCORE suitable?	2= 6%	4= 13%	7= 22%	11= 34%	7= 22%	1= 3%		01112_22233_33333_44445
5	Was DOUBLE suitable?	2= 6%	10= 31%	7= 22%	5= 16%	4= 13%	4= 13%		01111_11122_22333_44455
6	Was DEPOT suitable?	2= 6%	5= 16%	2= 6%	9= 28%	9= 28%	5= 16%		01112_23333_34444_44555
7	Was MOBILES understandable?	2= 6%	20= 63%	7= 22%	3= 9%	0	0		01111_11111_11112_22233
8	Was IOIWARI understandable?	2= 6%	8= 25%	5= 16%	14= 44%	2= 6%	1= 3%		01111_12223_33333_33345
9	Was TWOFIVE understandable?	2= 6%	10= 31%	9= 28%	8= 25%	3= 9%	0		01111_11122_22233_33344
10	Was SCORE understandable?	2= 6%	2= 6%	3= 9%	7= 22%	9= 28%	9= 28%		01123_33334_44445_55555
11	Was DOUBLE understandable?	2= 6%	8= 25%	12= 38%	8= 25%	1= 3%	1= 3%		01111_12222_22223_33335
12	Was DEPOT understandable?	3= 9%	8= 25%	11= 34%	8= 25%	2= 6%	0		00111_11222_22223_33334
13	Was MOBILES translatable?	9= 28%	13= 41%	3= 9%	7= 22%	0	0		00000_01111_11112_23333
14	Was IOIWARI translatable?	9= 28%	8= 25%	4= 13%	9= 28%	2= 6%	0		00000_01111_12233_33334
15	Was TWOFIVE translatable?	9= 28%	12= 38%	3= 9%	7= 22%	0	1= 3%		00000_01111_11122_33335
16	Was SCORE translatable?	8= 25%	5= 16%	4= 13%	4= 13%	4= 13%	7= 22%		00000_11122_23344_45555
17	Was DOUBLE translatable?	9= 28%	7= 22%	6= 19%	10= 31%	0	0		00000_01111_22223_33333
18	Was DEPOT translatable?	9= 28%	9= 28%	6= 19%	6= 19%	2= 6%	0		00000_01111_12222_33334
19	Task liked best?	4= 13%	10= 31%	5= 16%	3= 9%	3= 9%	0	7= 22%	00011_11112_22334_46666
20	Task liked least?	5= 16%	1= 3%	4= 13%	8= 25%	7= 22%	5= 16%	2= 6%	00012_23333_34444_45556
21	Like idea of non-secret input tasks?	3= 9%	4= 13%	25= 78%					00112_22222_22222_22222
22	Task Approval Procedure?	14= 44%	18= 56%						00000_00001_11111_11111
23	FreePascal compiler (not IDE)?	6= 19%	1= 3%	1= 3%	6= 19%	11= 34%	7= 22%		00002_33334_44444_45555
24	FreePascal IDE?	6= 19%	13= 41%	5= 16%	4= 13%	2= 6%	2= 6%		00001_11111_11222_33345
25	Gcc/G++ compiler?	4= 13%	0	0	4= 13%	8= 25%	16= 50%		00033_44444_55555_55555
26	RHIDE for gcc/g++?	7= 22%	3= 9%	1= 3%	8= 25%	10= 31%	3= 9%		00001_12333_33444_44455
27	Environment for grading execution?	2= 6%	22= 69%	8= 25%	0				01111_11111_11111_22222
28	Which single development environment?	4= 13%	15= 47%	13= 41%					00011_11111_11222_22222
29	Grading system for competitors?	2= 6%	2= 6%	3= 9%	8= 25%	10= 31%	7= 22%		01123_33334_44444_45555
30	Grading system evaluation reports?	1= 3%	1= 3%	1= 3%	5= 16%	14= 44%	10= 31%		02333_44444_44445_55555
31	Grading system after-grading support?	2= 6%	10= 31%	5= 16%	9= 28%	2= 6%	4= 13%		01111_11122_23333_34455
32	Need for practice competition?	0	1= 3%	0	1= 3%	7= 22%	23= 72%		14444_45555_55555_55555
33	Need for grading info handouts?	1= 3%	0	1= 3%	2= 6%	6= 19%	22= 69%		03344_45555_55555_55555
34	Need for extra score statistics?	0	1= 3%	2= 6%	7= 22%	5= 16%	17= 53%		12333_34445_55555_55555
35	Need for questionnaires?	1= 3%	1= 3%	0	9= 28%	9= 28%	12= 38%		03333_33444_44455_55555
36	Further comments?	16= 50%	16= 50%						00000_00000_11111_11111