The IOI'2004 Survey Results: Contestants
- Return to IOI'2004 Competition
Your feedback will help improve future IOI competitions.
-
Are you a:
Contestant 199 Delegation Leader? Blank -
Environment:
Check all combinations of operating systems, languages, and editors/debuggers that you used in either competition round:Windows editors Linux editors C C++ Pascal rhide 9.54% 28.14% 1% emacs 1% 1% Free Pascal IDE 38.69% other 3% 3.51% C C++ Pascal rhide 3% 6% 2.51% emacs 2% 12% 2% xemacs 4.52% 1% vi 8% 8.54% 3.51% joe 1% other 1% 14% 6.53% Windows debuggers Linux debuggers C C++ Pascal rhide 7.53% 22.61% 2% gdb 1% 3% 5.52% Free Pascal IDE 32.16% C C++ Pascal rhide 4.52% 5.52% 4% gdb 7.53% 11.56% 2% ddd 3% 1% Do you think it is useful to
allow contestants to bring in:Yes No Blank dictionaries 64.82% 28.14% 7.04% keyboards 75.37% 20.1% 4.53% mice 40.2% 49.74% 10.06% Did you bring in: Yes No Blank dictionaries 9.04% 85.42% 5.54% keyboards 13.57% 82.41% 4.02% mice 0.51% 90.95% 8.54% One idea for the future is to run only linux in the competition, and provide a
bootable CD-ROM with documentation for contestants to use for training.Yes No Blank Would you be satisfied using Linux if rhide and the Free Pascal IDE are provided? 66.83% 31.66% 1.51% Would you be satisfied using Linux with standard Linux editors (and no IDEs)? 41.70% 54.77% 3.53%
Another idea for the future is to allow submissions in Java.Yes No Blank Would you use Java if it were provided? 16.58% 82.91%
0.51% Would you need a Java IDE? 19.09% 71.86%
9.05% Even if you did not use Java, would you support making it available to others? 65.82% 31.16% 3.02% Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for JAVA? 40.70% 58.29% 1.01% Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for each programming language 32.16% 66.83% 1.01%
Was it useful to have available on the competition server web page:Yes No Blank IOI documents 79.39% 18.09% 2.52% Manuals on tools (e.g. rhide) 77.38% 21.61% 1.01% Programming language references 75.38% 4.74% 19.88% What other tools would you like to have available?
[Feedback omitted.]
Giving information about limits on 50% of test cases Yes No Blank Did it help you? 74.37% 24.62% 1.01% Is it a good idea in general? 65.83% 32.16% 2.01% Please give any other feedback about the environment.
[Feedback omitted.]
-
Tasks:
Understandability
Easy ... Hard [blank] Difficulty
Easy ... Hard [blank] Enjoyable?
Loved ... Hated [blank] Hermes 45.23% 31.66% 12.06% 6.53% 2.01% 2.51% 14.57% 28.64% 32.16% 19.88% 3.01% 1.74% 27.64% 25.12% 34.17% 2.01% 3.52% 7.54% Artemis 44.22% 36.18% 10.05% 3.01% 2.01% 4.53% 4.52% 27.64% 40.7% 18.61% 3.51% 5.02% 19.88% 26.63% 32.16% 11.05% 4.52% 5.76%% Polygon 19.88% 12.56% 22.61% 25.62% 17.08% 2.25% 1.02% 2.01% 4.52% 16.08% 71.85% 4.52% 3.01% 12.06% 19.88% 14.57% 44.72% 5.76%% Empodia 31.66% 23.61% 21.1% 12.56% 7.03% 4.04% 9.05% 25.12% 35.18% 22.11% 4.52% 4.02% 19.88% 27.64% 23.12% 14.56% 7.4%% 7.4%% Farmer 45.72% 26.13% 16.08% 5.52% 3.51% 3.04% 25.1% 35.17% 23.12% 10.05% 1.02% 5.54% 18.59% 23.12% 33.16% 13.06% 3.01% 9.06% Phidias 46.23% 25.12% 14.07% 4.52% 5.54% 4.52% 34.17% 20.6% 23.12% 14.07% 3.02% 5.02% 27.64% 18.6% 28.64% 10.05% 6.03% 9.04% Which task did you like most?
13.06%
Hermes15.58%
Artemis10.05%
Polygon23.62%
Empodia16.58
Farmer18.59%
Phidias2.52%
BlankWhich task did you like least?
4.02%
Hermes5.54%
Artemis61.80%
Polygon7.03%
Empodia8.04%
Farmer10.55%
Phidias3.02%
Blank -
Grading System:
Usability
Easy ... Hard [blank] Functionality
Good ... Bad [blank] Responsiveness
Fast ... Slow Blank Submission 74.87% 13.06% 6.53% 2.01% 1.01% 2.52% 62.81% 24.12% 7.54% 1.01% 0% 4.52% 36.68% 35.68% 16.09% 3.52% 1.01% 7.02% Test Runs 68.34% 15.07% 8.54% 3.01% 1.01% 4.03% 58.79% 20.6% 8.54% 3.52% 2.01% 6.54% 36.18% 26.63% 20.6% 4.52% 2.01% 10.06% Printing 56.79% 12.06% 5.54% 1.01% 1.01% 23.59% 48.24% 17.08% 8.54% 1.01% 3.01% 22.12% 29.14% 14.07% 21.6% 6.53% 3.01% 25.65% Backup/Restore 49.75% 16.08% 12.06% 1.01% 1.01% 20.09% 41.7% 25.63% 10.55% 1.01% 1.01% 20.1% 37.18% 23.62% 14.07% 1.01% 1.01% 23.11% Analysis Mode 44.72% 15.07% 14.07% 3.01% 3,01% 20.12% 36.68% 18.59% 15.07% 5.54% 2.01% 22.11% 32.16% 25.63% 19.09% 2.01% 0% 21.11%
Presentation
Good ... Bad [blank] Content
Good ... Bad [blank] Printed score sheets 41.02% 30.15% 14.07% 9.74% 2.01% 3.01% 45.73% 24.12% 17.59% 3.51% 3.51% 5.54% Online grading results 35.17% 28.14% 19.09% 5.54% 4.02% 8.04% 21.1% 39.7% 20.6% 3.51% 3.51% 11.58% Yes No Blank Did you use analysis mode? 51.26% 44.72% 4.02% Was analysis mode helpful to you? 47.73% 40.2% 12.06% Should analysis mode have additional features? (If so, what?)
[Feedback omitted.]
Please give any other feedback about the grading system.
[Feedback omitted.]
-
Please give any other feedback you have about the IOI 2004 Competition.
[Feedback omitted.]